Best Lava Iris Win1 Amazon.com Deals for Monday 27th of April 2026

for Lava Iris Win1 Micro USB White Car Vehicle 12V DC Lighter Outlet & Home Wall Travel Charger Adapter & 5 Ft Micro USB...
$13.95

for Lava Iris Win1 Micro USB Black Car Vehicle 12V DC Lighter Outlet & Home Wall Travel Charger Adapter & 5 Ft Micro USB...
$13.95

Cooper Belt Mate [Mobile Cell Phone Magnetic Protective Case] for Lava Iris Win1 / X1 / X1 Mini | Cover Holster Pouch (B...
$8.95

[UL Listed] Charger Adapter Wall Charger 5ft USB Cable Compatible Lava Iris Win1, Pro 20 30,Fuel 60 50, Atom 2 3 X/X1 At...
$10.98

for Lava Iris Win1 Micro USB White 5 Ft Charging Data Sync Cable Cord by Things Needed...
$9.95

for Lava Iris Win1 Micro USB White 6 Ft Charging Data Sync Cable Cord by Things Needed...
$9.95

for Lava Iris Win1 Micro USB Black 6 Ft Charging Data Sync Cable Cord by Things Needed...
$9.95

for Lava Iris Win1 Micro USB Black 5 Ft Charging Data Sync Cable Cord by Things Needed...
$9.95

for Lava Iris Win1 Micro USB Black Fast Rapid Home Wall Travel Charger Adapter & 3 Ft Micro USB Charging Cable by Things...
$12.95

for Lava Iris Win1 Micro USB White Fast Rapid Home Wall Travel Charger Adapter & 3 Ft Micro USB Charging Cable by Things...
$12.95
Best Lava Iris Win1 Ebay.com Deals for Monday 27th of April 2026
USB Charging Cord Sync Cable Charger for Lava Iris Models Mobile Phone...
$14.99
Power Adaptor & USB Wall Charger For Lava Iris Win1 Mobile Smart Phone...
$11.25
USB DATA & BATTERY CHARGER LEAD FOR Lava Iris Win1 Mobile Smart Phone...
$4.38
Design
| Dimensions | Lava Iris Win1 vs average Lava dimensions comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Lava Iris Win1 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Lava Iris Win1 vs average smartphone dimensions comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 119.7 mm vs 139.9 mm | 20.2 mm shorter | -14.4% | 119.7 mm | -16.6% | 23.79 mm shorter | 119.7 mm vs 143.5 mm |
| Width | 62.3 mm vs 70.6 mm | 8.31 mm tighter | -11.8% | 62.3 mm | -13.2% | 9.48 mm thinner | 62.3 mm vs 71.8 mm |
| Thickness | 11.7 mm vs 9.2 mm | 2.47 mm larger | +26.7% | 11.7 mm | +27.8% | 2.55 mm larger thickness | 11.7 mm vs 9.2 mm |
| Weight | 129 g vs 145.5 g | 16.49 g lighter | -11.3% | 129 g | -16.7% | 25.95 g lighter | 129 g vs 154.9 g |
| Summary | |||||||
Performance
| RAM Memory | Lava Iris Win1 vs average Lava RAM memory options comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Lava Iris Win1 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Lava Iris Win1 vs average smartphone RAM memory options comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAM Memory Size | 1 GB vs 1.5 GB | 0.51 GB less RAM memory | -33.8% | 1 GB | -58.9% | 1.43 GB less RAM memory | 1 GB vs 2.4 GB |
| RAM Speed | 333 MHz vs 1083 MHz | 750 MHz lower RAM speed | -69.3% | 333 MHz | -72.6% | 883.73 MHz lower RAM speed | 333 MHz vs 1216.7 MHz |
| RAM Memory Channels | 1 | -45.4% | 0.83 less memory channel(s) | 1 vs 1.8 | |||
| Summary | |||||||
Features
| Networks Connectivity | Lava Iris Win1 vs average Lava Networks connectivity features comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Lava Iris Win1 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Lava Iris Win1 vs average smartphone Networks connectivity features comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports Cellular Networks | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.9% YES | ||||
| GPS Navigation | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 98.7% YES | ||||
| Supports WiFi Connections | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.4% YES | ||||
| Bluetooth Version | 4 vs 3.7 | 0.31 newer Bluetooth version | 4 | 0.05 newer Bluetooth version | 4 vs 3.9 | ||
| Hotspot Wireless Sharing | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.9% YES | ||||
| 802.11n WiFi Connections | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.8% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Capacity
| Battery Capacity | Lava Iris Win1 vs average Lava battery capacity comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Lava Iris Win1 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Lava Iris Win1 vs average smartphone battery capacity comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Power | 1950 mAh vs 2363.8 mAh | 413.75 mAh less battery power | -17.5% | 1950 mAh | -29.7% | 822.49 mAh less battery power | 1950 mAh vs 2772.5 mAh |
| Battery Level Indicator | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Rechargeable Battery | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||







Reviews
There are no reviews yet.