Micromax Canvas Gold A300

In stock

Best Micromax Canvas Gold A300 Amazon.com Deals for Thursday 30th of April 2026

N4U Online 5 Pack Retractable Stylus Pen Value Pack for Micromax Canvas Gold A300...

CameronSino Standby Battery Compatible with Micromax Mobile, Smartphone A300, Canvas Gold...

VINTRONS, Battery for MICROMAX A300, Canvas Gold,...
$22.76

Cameron-Sino CS Backup Battery for Micromax Mobile, Smartphone A300, Canvas Gold...
$15.46

2300mAh Battery Replacement for Micromax A300, Canvas Gold, P/N LWDEB16...
$19.61

GAXI Battery for A300, Canvas Gold Replacement for Micromax Mobile Smartphone Battery...
$17.89

CS Replaceable Battery for Micromax Mobile, Smartphone A300, Canvas Gold...
$19.19

Celicious Matte Anti-Glare Screen Protector Film Compatible with Micromax A300 Canvas Gold [Pack of 2]...
$9.95

Cameron Sino 2300mAh Battery for Micromax A300, Canvas Gold...
$17.99

Compatible for Micromax A300 Canvas Gold -6ft Mini B Cable+Micro M to Mini B 5-Pin F Adapter...
$8.17
Best Micromax Canvas Gold A300 Ebay.com Deals for Thursday 30th of April 2026

Design

Display Options Micromax Canvas Gold A300 vs average Micromax display options comparison Difference in units Difference in % Micromax Canvas Gold A300 Difference in % Difference in units Micromax Canvas Gold A300 vs average smartphone display options comparison
Resolution 2073600 px vs 946167.5 px 1127432.45 px higher resolution +119.2% 2073600 px +55.4% 738853.01 px higher resolution 2073600 px vs 1334747 px
Pixel Density 401 ppi vs 279.1 ppi 121.87 ppi higher pixel density +43.7% 401 ppi +25.8% 82.2 ppi more pixel density 401 ppi vs 318.8 ppi
Screen Size 5.5 " vs 5.1 " 0.42 " larger screen size +8.3% 5.5 " +8.1% 0.41 " larger screen size 5.5 " vs 5.1 "
Touch Screen YES vs 100% YES YES YES vs 98.8% YES
IPS Screen YES vs 97.6% YES YES YES vs 89.7% YES
LCD Displays 3 Subpixels per Pixel YES vs 100% YES YES YES vs 89.8% YES
Summary

Performance

GPU Graphics Cards Micromax Canvas Gold A300 vs average Micromax Graphics GPU options comparison Difference in units Difference in % Micromax Canvas Gold A300 Difference in % Difference in units Micromax Canvas Gold A300 vs average smartphone Graphics GPU options comparison
GPU Graphics Speed 650 MHz vs 530.7 MHz 119.3 MHz higher GPU Graphics speed +22.5% 650 MHz +12.8% 73.98 MHz higher GPU Graphics speed 650 MHz vs 576 MHz
TFLOPS 0.0584 TFLOPS vs 0 TFLOPS 0.04 TFLOPS more floating-point performance +330% 0.0584 TFLOPS -27.5% 0.02 TFLOPS less floating-point performance 0.0584 TFLOPS vs 0.1 TFLOPS
Pixels Rate per Second 5.2 GPixel/s vs 1.7 GPixel/s 3.52 GPixel/s higher pixel rate +208.8% 5.2 GPixel/s +111.6% 2.74 GPixel/s higher pixel rate 5.2 GPixel/s vs 2.5 GPixel/s
Summary

Features

Networks Connectivity Micromax Canvas Gold A300 vs average Micromax Networks connectivity features comparison Difference in units Difference in % Micromax Canvas Gold A300 Difference in % Difference in units Micromax Canvas Gold A300 vs average smartphone Networks connectivity features comparison
Supports Cellular Networks YES vs 100% YES YES YES vs 99.9% YES
GPS Navigation YES vs 100% YES YES YES vs 98.7% YES
Supports WiFi Connections YES vs 100% YES YES YES vs 99.4% YES
Bluetooth Version 4 vs 3.8 0.18 newer Bluetooth version 4 0.05 newer Bluetooth version 4 vs 3.9
Hotspot Wireless Sharing YES vs 100% YES YES YES vs 99.9% YES
802.11n WiFi Connections YES vs 100% YES YES YES vs 99.8% YES
Turn-by-Turn GPS Navigation YES vs 100% YES YES YES vs 99.6% YES
Summary

Capacity

Model Benchmarks Micromax Canvas Gold A300 vs average Micromax Benchmarks performance comparison Difference in units Difference in % Micromax Canvas Gold A300 Difference in % Difference in units Micromax Canvas Gold A300 vs average smartphone Benchmarks performance comparison
Head SAR (US) Radio Frequency Absorption Rate 0.21 W/kg vs 0.4 W/kg 0.17 W/kg lower Head radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) -44% 0.21 W/kg -74.1% 0.6 W/kg lower Head radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) 0.21 W/kg vs 0.8 W/kg
Body SAR (US) Radio Frequency Absorption Rate 0.56 W/kg vs 0.6 W/kg 0.08 W/kg lower Body radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) -13% 0.56 W/kg -40.1% 0.38 W/kg lower Body radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) 0.56 W/kg vs 0.9 W/kg
Summary
Submit your review

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

See It Styled On Instagram

    Instagram did not return any images.

Shop By Department