Best TP-Link Neffos C5L Amazon.com Deals for Sunday 26th of April 2026
Best TP-Link Neffos C5L Ebay.com Deals for Sunday 26th of April 2026
Wolf-Design Flip Case Wallet Leather Cover For Ulefone Umidigi and Various Phone...
$10.99
Shockproof For TP-Link/STK - Silicone Ring Holder Stand Case Shell Cover Bumper...
$8.99
Tp-Link Neffos C5L Favory Leather Case Cover Pouch Protective Phone Case...
$20.03
Accessories For TP-Link TP601 Neffos C5L (2016): Sock Bag Case Sleeve Belt Cl......
$27.95
For TP-Link Neffos/Gome/Timmy/Unimax - Genuine Real Leather Case Cover Wallet...
$13.98
For TP-LINK/THL/Uhans/Teeno - Cute Leather Case Flip Folio Cover Skin Wallet New...
$10.98
Battery for TP-Link Neffos C5L, Neffos C5L Dual SIM, TP601A, TP601B,...
$18.0
Handy Tasche für TP-Link Book Case Klapp Cover Schutz Etui Hülle Flipcase Wallet...
$9.99
Design
| Dimensions | TP-Link Neffos C5L vs average TP-Link dimensions comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | TP-Link Neffos C5L | Difference in % | Difference in units | TP-Link Neffos C5L vs average smartphone dimensions comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 136 mm vs 150.1 mm | 14.13 mm shorter | -9.4% | 136 mm | -5.2% | 7.49 mm smaller height | 136 mm vs 143.5 mm |
| Width | 67.7 mm vs 74.7 mm | 7 mm tighter | -9.4% | 67.7 mm | -5.7% | 4.08 mm thinner | 67.7 mm vs 71.8 mm |
| Thickness | 10.1 mm vs 8.4 mm | 1.68 mm larger | +20% | 10.1 mm | +10.3% | 0.95 mm larger thickness | 10.1 mm vs 9.2 mm |
| Weight | 154 g vs 151 g | 3 g more weight | +2% | 154 g | -0.6% | 0.95 g lighter | 154 g vs 154.9 g |
| Summary | |||||||
Performance
| Chipset SoC | TP-Link Neffos C5L vs average TP-Link chipset options comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | TP-Link Neffos C5L | Difference in % | Difference in units | TP-Link Neffos C5L vs average smartphone chipset options comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports 64-bit OS Operating System | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 94.3% YES | ||||
| Semiconductor Size | 28 nm vs 24 nm | 4 nm larger semiconductor size | +16.7% | 28 nm | +11.3% | 2.85 nm larger semiconductor size | 28 nm vs 25.2 nm |
| Supports Integrated GPU Graphics | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.9% YES | ||||
| Integrated LTE Cellular Chip | YES | ||||||
| Summary | |||||||
Features
| Software Versions, Standards, Formats | TP-Link Neffos C5L vs average TP-Link Versions comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | TP-Link Neffos C5L | Difference in % | Difference in units | TP-Link Neffos C5L vs average smartphone Versions comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DirectX Version | 9.3 | 1.24 older DirectX version | 9.3 vs 10.5 | ||||
| OpenGL version | 3.1 vs 3.1 | 0 newer OpenGL version | 3.1 | 0.05 newer OpenGL version | 3.1 vs 3.1 | ||
| OpenVG version | 3 | 1.09 newer OpenVG version | 3 vs 1.9 | ||||
| OpenCL version | 1.1 vs 1.2 | 0.1 older OpenCL version | 1.1 | 0.17 older OpenCL version | 1.1 vs 1.3 | ||
| OpenGL ES 3.0 | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Capacity
| Battery Capacity | TP-Link Neffos C5L vs average TP-Link battery capacity comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | TP-Link Neffos C5L | Difference in % | Difference in units | TP-Link Neffos C5L vs average smartphone battery capacity comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Power | 2000 mAh vs 2835 mAh | 835 mAh less battery power | -29.5% | 2000 mAh | -27.9% | 772.49 mAh less battery power | 2000 mAh vs 2772.5 mAh |
| Battery Level Indicator | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Rechargeable Battery | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||







Reviews
There are no reviews yet.