Best LG Zone 4 Ebay.com Deals for Wednesday 29th of April 2026
VERIZON LG ZONE 4 CELL PHONE OPEN BOX NEW - FREE SHIPPING...
$25.99
LG Rebel 4 3 Fortune Aristo 2 Plus Phoenix 3 4 Zone 4 Case Clip SCREEN PROTECTOR...
$4.95
VERIZON ZONE 4 ANDROID LG X210VPP CELL PHONE ...
$39.99
LG X210VPP Zone 4 16GB Verizon Wireless Smartphone - Excellent...
$55.95
Fair LG Zone 4 16GB Blue LM-X210VPP (Verizon) Android Smartphone...
$29.99
LG VS425 Optimus Zone 3 8GB Verizon Smartphone - GOOD CONDITION...
$15.0
LG Optimus Zone 2 VS415PP (Verizon) 3G Smartphone - Black 3.5" (Sealed)...
$15.0
LG Optimus Zone 3 VS425PP Verizon Wireless Prepaid Smartphone 4.5" 4G LTE Black ...
$49.97
LG Zone 4 [4-PACK BISEN] HD Clear Screen Protector Guard Shield Film Saver...
$5.45
LG LM-X210VPP Zone 4 Verizon Smartphone ...
$39.9
UNLOCKED -Verizon Wireless smartphone LG Zone 4 Prepaid 16GB - NEW...
$55.0
Design
| Dimensions | LG Zone 4 vs average LG dimensions comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | LG Zone 4 | Difference in % | Difference in units | LG Zone 4 vs average smartphone dimensions comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 144.8 mm vs 138.6 mm | 6.21 mm more height | +4.5% | 144.8 mm | +0.9% | 1.31 mm larger height | 144.8 mm vs 143.5 mm |
| Width | 71.9 mm vs 70.7 mm | 1.18 mm wider | +1.7% | 71.9 mm | +0.2% | 0.12 mm wider | 71.9 mm vs 71.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm vs 9.4 mm | 1.5 mm smaller thickness | -16% | 7.9 mm | -13.7% | 1.25 mm smaller thickness | 7.9 mm vs 9.2 mm |
| Weight | 140.3 g vs 144.2 g | 3.91 g lighter | -2.7% | 140.3 g | -9.5% | 14.65 g lighter | 140.3 g vs 154.9 g |
| Summary | |||||||
Performance
| Chipset SoC | LG Zone 4 vs average LG chipset options comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | LG Zone 4 | Difference in % | Difference in units | LG Zone 4 vs average smartphone chipset options comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports 64-bit OS Operating System | YES vs 90.4% YES | YES | YES vs 94.3% YES | ||||
| Semiconductor Size | 28 nm vs 27 nm | 1.01 nm larger semiconductor size | +3.8% | 28 nm | +11.3% | 2.85 nm larger semiconductor size | 28 nm vs 25.2 nm |
| Supports Integrated GPU Graphics | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.9% YES | ||||
| Virtualization (Hardware-Assisted) | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Maximum Memory Bandwith | 5.3 GB/s vs 11.8 GB/s | 6.48 GB/s less maximum memory bandwith | -55% | 5.3 GB/s | -55.7% | 6.66 GB/s less maximum memory bandwith | 5.3 GB/s vs 12 GB/s |
| Integrated LTE Cellular Chip | YES vs 23.7% YES | YES | YES vs 17.3% YES | ||||
| Supports AES Speed Up | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Features
| Software Versions, Standards, Formats | LG Zone 4 vs average LG Versions comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | LG Zone 4 | Difference in % | Difference in units | LG Zone 4 vs average smartphone Versions comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenGL version | 3.1 vs 3.1 | 0.02 newer OpenGL version | 3.1 | 0.05 newer OpenGL version | 3.1 vs 3.1 | ||
| OpenGL ES version | 3 vs 3.1 | 0.05 older OpenGL ES version | 3 | 0.1 newer OpenGL ES version | 3 vs 2.9 | ||
| OpenGL ES 3.0 | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| EGL version | 1.4 vs 1.4 | 0 newer EGL version | 1.4 | 0 newer EGL version | 1.4 vs 1.4 | ||
| Summary | |||||||
Capacity
| Battery Capacity | LG Zone 4 vs average LG battery capacity comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | LG Zone 4 | Difference in % | Difference in units | LG Zone 4 vs average smartphone battery capacity comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Power | 2500 mAh vs 2522.6 mAh | 22.62 mAh less battery power | -0.9% | 2500 mAh | -9.8% | 272.49 mAh less battery power | 2500 mAh vs 2772.5 mAh |
| Removable Battery | YES vs 71.6% YES | YES | YES vs 50.4% YES | ||||
| Battery Level Indicator | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Rechargeable Battery | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Battery Life Hours | 15.41 h vs 16.1 h | 0.73 h less life hours | -4.6% | 15.41 h | -20% | 3.86 h less life hours | 15.41 h vs 19.3 h |
| Summary | |||||||






Reviews
There are no reviews yet.