Coolpad Torino S
Roll over image to zoom in
Best Coolpad Torino S Amazon.com Deals for Friday 24th of April 2026
[UL Listed] Charger Adapter Wall Charger 5ft Micro USB Cable Compatible Coolpad Modena/Modena 2,Torino/Torino S, Porto/P...
$10.98
Cell Phone Case for Coolpad Torino S Heavy Duty Secure Rugged Horizontal Canvas Nylon Pouch Bag with Metal Belt Clip...
$9.95
Cell Phone Case for Coolpad Torino S Black Leather Look Horizontal Stylish Luxury Pouch Bag with Belt Clip...
$9.95
Case for Coolpad Torino S E561 Case Special Leather Shell Cover BM...
$22.00
Case for Coolpad Torino S Case Cover DK-SJ...
$20.00
MyVolts 5V Power Supply Adaptor Compatible with Coolpad Torino S Phone - US Plug...
$18.49
Case for Coolpad Torino S E561 Cover Flip PU Leather + Silicone case Fixed SJ...
$20.00
Case for Coolpad Torino S E561 Cover Flip PU Leather + Silicone case Fixed Lang...
$20.00
Case for Coolpad Torino S Lte Case Cover DK-SJ...
$20.00
Case for Coolpad Torino S Lte Case Cover DK-LH...
$20.00
Best Coolpad Torino S Ebay.com Deals for Friday 24th of April 2026
OtB Bag Mobile Case Faux Leather for Coolpad Torino S Flipcase Black New...
$17.08
Power Adaptor & USB Wall Charger For Coolpad Torino S Phone...
$11.25
Design
| Dimensions | Coolpad Torino S vs average Coolpad dimensions comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Coolpad Torino S | Difference in % | Difference in units | Coolpad Torino S vs average smartphone dimensions comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 139 mm vs 147.5 mm | 8.53 mm shorter | -5.8% | 139 mm | -3.1% | 4.49 mm smaller height | 139 mm vs 143.5 mm |
| Width | 67.8 mm vs 73.2 mm | 5.35 mm tighter | -7.3% | 67.8 mm | -5.5% | 3.98 mm thinner | 67.8 mm vs 71.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm vs 8.4 mm | 0.48 mm thinner | -5.7% | 7.9 mm | -13.7% | 1.25 mm smaller thickness | 7.9 mm vs 9.2 mm |
| Weight | 119 g vs 151.6 g | 32.65 g less weight | -21.5% | 119 g | -23.2% | 35.95 g lighter | 119 g vs 154.9 g |
| Summary | |||||||
Performance
| Storage Memory | Coolpad Torino S vs average Coolpad Storate memory options comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Coolpad Torino S | Difference in % | Difference in units | Coolpad Torino S vs average smartphone Storage memory options comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal Storage Memory | 16 GB vs 34.6 GB | 18.6 GB less internal storage memory | -53.8% | 16 GB | -58.1% | 22.17 GB less internal storage memory | 16 GB vs 38.2 GB |
| Maximum External Storage Memory | 32 GB vs 50.7 GB | 18.67 GB less maximum external storage memory | -36.8% | 32 GB | -85.3% | 184.97 GB less maximum external storage memory | 32 GB vs 217 GB |
| Summary | |||||||
Features
| Software Versions, Standards, Formats | Coolpad Torino S vs average Coolpad Versions comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Coolpad Torino S | Difference in % | Difference in units | Coolpad Torino S vs average smartphone Versions comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DirectX Version | 9.3 vs 10.3 | 1.03 older DirectX version | 9.3 | 1.24 older DirectX version | 9.3 vs 10.5 | ||
| OpenGL version | 3.1 vs 3.1 | 0.01 newer OpenGL version | 3.1 | 0.05 newer OpenGL version | 3.1 vs 3.1 | ||
| OpenVG version | 3 vs 2.3 | 0.71 newer OpenVG version | 3 | 1.09 newer OpenVG version | 3 vs 1.9 | ||
| OpenGL ES version | 3 vs 3 | 0.04 older OpenGL ES version | 3 | 0.1 newer OpenGL ES version | 3 vs 2.9 | ||
| OpenCL version | 1.1 vs 1.2 | 0.12 older OpenCL version | 1.1 | 0.17 older OpenCL version | 1.1 vs 1.3 | ||
| OpenGL ES 3.0 | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| EGL version | 1.4 vs 1.4 | 0 older EGL version | 1.4 | 0 newer EGL version | 1.4 vs 1.4 | ||
| Summary | |||||||
Capacity
| Battery Capacity | Coolpad Torino S vs average Coolpad battery capacity comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Coolpad Torino S | Difference in % | Difference in units | Coolpad Torino S vs average smartphone battery capacity comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Power | 1800 mAh vs 2797.9 mAh | 997.89 mAh less battery power | -35.7% | 1800 mAh | -35.1% | 972.49 mAh less battery power | 1800 mAh vs 2772.5 mAh |
| Battery Level Indicator | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Rechargeable Battery | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Battery Life Hours | 5 h vs 8 h | 3 h less life hours | -37.5% | 5 h | -74.1% | 14.27 h less life hours | 5 h vs 19.3 h |
| Summary | |||||||
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.