Xolo Win Q900s
Roll over image to zoom in
Best Xolo Win Q900s Amazon.com Deals for Friday 24th of April 2026
Adaptive Fast 15W Kit for Xolo Win Q900s with Quick Charge Wall+Car+MicroUSB Cable gives 2x faster charging! (Black)...
$19.99
Adaptive Fast 15W Kit for Xolo Win Q900s with Quick Charge Wall+Car+MicroUSB Cable gives 2x faster charging! (White)...
$19.99
Professional Ultra SanDisk 256GB verified for Xolo Win Q900s MicroSDXC card with CUSTOM Hi-Speed, Lossless Format! Inclu...
$80.99
Performance Grade 128GB Xolo Win Q900s MicroSDXC Card by MIXZA is Pro-Speed, Heat & Cold Resistant, and built for Lifeti...
$69.99
Professional Kingston 64GB Xolo Win Q900s MicroSDXC Card with custom formatting and Standard SD Adapter! (Class 10, UHS-...
$39.99
Turbo Quick Wall and Car Charger Kit for Xolo Win Q900s with MicroUSB & USB Type-C Cables! (33Watts)...
$38.99
Professional Kingston 128GB Xolo Win Q900s MicroSDXC Card with custom formatting and Standard SD Adapter! (Class 10, UHS...
$80.99
Professional Kingston 32GB Xolo Win Q900s MicroSDHC Card with custom formatting and Standard SD Adapter! (Class 10, UHS-...
$22.99
Bestdeal Wireless Bluetooth Game Controller Gamepad Joystick for Xolo Q900s Plus & Q900T & Win Q900s & X1000 & X910 Smar...
Adaptive QC 2.0 Wall Kit for Xolo Win Q900s with cable! True Digital Adaptive Fast Charging uses dual voltage for up to ...
$15.99
Best Xolo Win Q900s Ebay.com Deals for Friday 24th of April 2026
USB Charging Cord Data Sync Cable Charger for XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 Win Q1010 Phones...
$14.99
Design
| Dimensions | Xolo Win Q900s vs average Xolo dimensions comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Xolo Win Q900s | Difference in % | Difference in units | Xolo Win Q900s vs average smartphone dimensions comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 135.8 mm vs 142.3 mm | 6.52 mm less height | -4.6% | 135.8 mm | -5.4% | 7.69 mm shorter | 135.8 mm vs 143.5 mm |
| Width | 67.2 mm vs 71 mm | 3.78 mm tighter | -5.3% | 67.2 mm | -6.4% | 4.58 mm thinner | 67.2 mm vs 71.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm vs 8.5 mm | 1.32 mm thinner | -15.5% | 7.2 mm | -21.3% | 1.95 mm thinner | 7.2 mm vs 9.2 mm |
| Weight | 100 g vs 134.5 g | 34.55 g less weight | -25.7% | 100 g | -35.5% | 54.95 g lighter | 100 g vs 154.9 g |
| Summary | |||||||
Features
| Hardware Features | Xolo Win Q900s vs average Xolo Hardware features comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Xolo Win Q900s | Difference in % | Difference in units | Xolo Win Q900s vs average smartphone Hardware features comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports Dual/Two SIM Cards | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 89.8% YES | ||||
| Micro /SD/ External Memory Slots | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 92.6% YES | ||||
| Compass | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 91.4% YES | ||||
| Accelerometer | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 98.7% YES | ||||
| USB Version | 2 vs 2 | 0 newer USB version | 2 | 0.05 older USB version | 2 vs 2 | ||
| Summary | |||||||
Capacity
| Battery Capacity | Xolo Win Q900s vs average Xolo battery capacity comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Xolo Win Q900s | Difference in % | Difference in units | Xolo Win Q900s vs average smartphone battery capacity comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Power | 1800 mAh vs 2386.7 mAh | 586.67 mAh less battery power | -24.6% | 1800 mAh | -35.1% | 972.49 mAh less battery power | 1800 mAh vs 2772.5 mAh |
| Battery Level Indicator | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Rechargeable Battery | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.