LG Gossip Pro C660

In stock

Best LG Gossip Pro C660 Amazon.com Deals for Tuesday 28th of April 2026
Best LG Gossip Pro C660 Ebay.com Deals for Tuesday 28th of April 2026

5v LG Optimus I II P LN LX Neon Series USB Ac Adapter charger Power Supply Cord...
$11.59

Design

Display Options LG Gossip Pro C660 vs average LG display options comparison Difference in units Difference in % LG Gossip Pro C660 Difference in % Difference in units LG Gossip Pro C660 vs average smartphone display options comparison
Resolution 76800 px vs 1222808.7 px 1146008.7 px smaller resolution -93.7% 76800 px -94.2% 1257946.99 px smaller resolution 76800 px vs 1334747 px
Pixel Density 143 ppi vs 298.5 ppi 155.48 ppi lower pixel density -52.1% 143 ppi -55.1% 175.8 ppi less pixel density 143 ppi vs 318.8 ppi
Screen Size 2.8 " vs 4.9 " 2.15 " smaller screen size -43.4% 2.8 " -44.9% 2.29 " smaller 2.8 " vs 5.1 "
Touch Screen YES vs 100% YES YES YES vs 98.8% YES
LCD Displays 3 Subpixels per Pixel YES vs 96.3% YES YES YES vs 89.8% YES
Summary

Features

Networks Connectivity LG Gossip Pro C660 vs average LG Networks connectivity features comparison Difference in units Difference in % LG Gossip Pro C660 Difference in % Difference in units LG Gossip Pro C660 vs average smartphone Networks connectivity features comparison
Supports Cellular Networks YES vs 100% YES YES YES vs 99.9% YES
GPS Navigation YES vs 100% YES YES YES vs 98.7% YES
Supports WiFi Connections YES vs 100% YES YES YES vs 99.4% YES
Bluetooth Version 3 vs 4 0.96 older Bluetooth version 3 0.95 older Bluetooth version 3 vs 3.9
Hotspot Wireless Sharing YES vs 99.3% YES YES YES vs 99.9% YES
802.11n WiFi Connections YES vs 100% YES YES YES vs 99.8% YES
Summary

Capacity

Model Benchmarks LG Gossip Pro C660 vs average LG Benchmarks performance comparison Difference in units Difference in % LG Gossip Pro C660 Difference in % Difference in units LG Gossip Pro C660 vs average smartphone Benchmarks performance comparison
Head SAR (US) Radio Frequency Absorption Rate 0.43 W/kg vs 0.8 W/kg 0.33 W/kg lower Head radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) -43.2% 0.43 W/kg -46.9% 0.38 W/kg lower Head radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) 0.43 W/kg vs 0.8 W/kg
Body SAR (US) Radio Frequency Absorption Rate 0.94 W/kg vs 1 W/kg 0.04 W/kg lower Body radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) -4.3% 0.94 W/kg +0.5% 0 W/kg higher Body radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) 0.94 W/kg vs 0.9 W/kg
Summary
Submit your review

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

See It Styled On Instagram

    Instagram did not return any images.

Shop By Department