Crosscall Shark-X3
Roll over image to zoom in
Best Crosscall Shark-X3 Amazon.com Deals for Friday 5th of June 2026
MyVolts 5V in-car Power Supply Adaptor Compatible with Crosscall Shark X3 Phone...
$11.49
MyVolts 5V Power Supply Adaptor Compatible with Crosscall Shark X3 Phone - US Plug...
$18.49
MyVolts 5V USB Power Cable Compatible with Crosscall Shark X3 Phone...
$7.49
DURAGADGET Volume Limiting Magical Unicorn Kids' Headphones with Audio Sharing Port - Compatible with Crosscall Shark-X3...
$27.49
Bedifol upscreen Scratch Shield Clear Screen Protector for Crosscall Shark X3, Strong Scratch Protection, High Transpare...
$15.98
Bedifol 2X BROTECT Matte Screen Protector for Crosscall Shark X3, Matte, Anti-Glare, Anti-Scratch...
$11.98
Bedifol upscreen Spy Shield Clear Privacy Screen Protector for Crosscall Shark X3, self-Adhesive, Privacy Protection, Mu...
$20.98
Bedifol 6X Savvies Ultra-Clear Screen Protector for Crosscall Shark X3, accurately Fitting - Simple Assembly - Residue-F...
$8.98
Bedifol 2X BROTECT HD-Clear Screen Protector for Crosscall Shark X3, Crystal-Clear, Hard-Coated, Dirt-Repellent...
$11.98
Bedifol upscreen Reflection Shield Matte Screen Protector for Crosscall Shark X3, Matte and Anti-Glare, Strong Scratch P...
$15.98
Best Crosscall Shark-X3 Ebay.com Deals for Friday 5th of June 2026
Design
| Dimensions | Crosscall Shark-X3 vs average Crosscall dimensions comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Crosscall Shark-X3 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Crosscall Shark-X3 vs average smartphone dimensions comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 134 mm vs 146.1 mm | 12.07 mm less height | -8.3% | 134 mm | -6.6% | 9.49 mm shorter | 134 mm vs 143.5 mm |
| Width | 61 mm vs 74.8 mm | 13.81 mm less width | -18.5% | 61 mm | -15% | 10.78 mm smaller width | 61 mm vs 71.8 mm |
| Thickness | 24 mm vs 15.2 mm | 8.78 mm larger | +57.7% | 24 mm | +162.2% | 14.85 mm larger thickness | 24 mm vs 9.2 mm |
| Weight | 141 g vs 218.3 g | 77.33 g lighter | -35.4% | 141 g | -9% | 13.95 g less weight | 141 g vs 154.9 g |
| Summary | |||||||
Performance
| Storage Memory | Crosscall Shark-X3 vs average Crosscall Storate memory options comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Crosscall Shark-X3 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Crosscall Shark-X3 vs average smartphone Storage memory options comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal Storage Memory | 0.128 GB vs 17.5 GB | 17.34 GB less internal storage memory | -99.3% | 0.128 GB | -99.7% | 38.04 GB less internal storage memory | 0.128 GB vs 38.2 GB |
| Maximum External Storage Memory | 32 GB vs 121.6 GB | 89.6 GB less maximum external storage memory | -73.7% | 32 GB | -85.3% | 184.97 GB less maximum external storage memory | 32 GB vs 217 GB |
| Summary | |||||||
Features
| Hardware Features | Crosscall Shark-X3 vs average Crosscall Hardware features comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Crosscall Shark-X3 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Crosscall Shark-X3 vs average smartphone Hardware features comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports Dual/Two SIM Cards | YES vs 81.8% YES | YES | YES vs 89.8% YES | ||||
| Micro /SD/ External Memory Slots | YES vs 90.9% YES | YES | YES vs 92.6% YES | ||||
| USB Version | 2 vs 2.1 | 0.1 older USB version | 2 | 0.05 older USB version | 2 vs 2 | ||
| Summary | |||||||
Capacity
| Battery Capacity | Crosscall Shark-X3 vs average Crosscall battery capacity comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Crosscall Shark-X3 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Crosscall Shark-X3 vs average smartphone battery capacity comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Power | 950 mAh vs 2981.8 mAh | 2031.82 mAh less battery power | -68.1% | 950 mAh | -65.7% | 1822.49 mAh less battery power | 950 mAh vs 2772.5 mAh |
| Battery Level Indicator | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Rechargeable Battery | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Battery Life Hours | 10 h vs 21.8 h | 11.75 h less life hours | -54% | 10 h | -48.1% | 9.27 h less life hours | 10 h vs 19.3 h |
| Summary | |||||||
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.