Samsung Galaxy Stellar
Roll over image to zoom in
Best Samsung Galaxy Stellar Ebay.com Deals for Monday 27th of April 2026
Samsung Galaxy Stellar SCH-I200 - 4GB - Black (Verizon)...
$13.49
Samsung SCH-1200 Galaxy Stellar Smart Phone...
$29.75
Samsung Galaxy Stellar SCH-1200 Smart Phone...
$49.5
Samsung Galaxy Stellar SCH-I200 - 4GB - Black (VZW/MVNO) USED/WORKING Smartphone...
$19.99
Samsung Galaxy Stellar SCH-I200 - 4GB - Black (Verizon/MVNO) Smartphone (WORKS)...
$18.9
Samsung Galaxy Stellar SCH-I200- Black(Verizon) Smartphone Cell Phone Page Plus...
$15.99
Samsung Galaxy Stellar SCH-I200 - 4GB - Black Verizon Used/Working Smartphone...
$19.95
Samsung Galaxy Stellar SCH-I200 - 4GB - Black (Verizon) Smartphone...
$31.0
Hard Case Phone Cover for Samsung Galaxy Stellar i200 SCH-i200...
$6.98
Samsung Galaxy Stellar SCH-I200 - 4GB - Black (Verizon) Smartphone...
$8.2
Samsung Galaxy Stellar SCH - I200 4GB - Black (Verizon) Phone Must Read...
$39.99
Samsung Galaxy Stellar SCH-I200 - 4GB - Black (Verizon) Smartphone. Q47...
$35.0
Samsung Galaxy Stellar/Legend SCH-I200 4GB Black 4G Verizon 30 DAY WARRANTY ...
$21.2
Samsung Galaxy Stellar Blk Very Good Condition....
$11.95
GOOD! Samsung Galaxy Stellar i200 Android WIFI 4G LTE Touch VERIZON Smartphone...
$29.95
Ventev Flexible Textured Gel Case for Samsung Galaxy Stellar - Black / Bumps...
$7.02
Samsung Galaxy Stellar SCH-I200- Black(Verizon) Smartphone Cell Phone Page Plus...
$64.34
Samsung Galaxy Stellar SCH-I200 - 4GB - Black (Verizon) Smartphone...
$25.0
Samsung SCH-i200 Galaxy Stellar Verizon Phone DLNA GOOD ...
$17.8
Samsung Galaxy Stellar SCH-I200 - 4GB - Black (Verizon) Smartphone ...
$25.0
Design
| Display Options | Samsung Galaxy Stellar vs average Samsung display options comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Samsung Galaxy Stellar | Difference in % | Difference in units | Samsung Galaxy Stellar vs average smartphone display options comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 384000 px vs 1327789.3 px | 943789.33 px smaller resolution | -71.1% | 384000 px | -71.2% | 950746.99 px smaller resolution | 384000 px vs 1334747 px |
| Pixel Density | 233 ppi vs 314 ppi | 80.99 ppi less pixel density | -25.8% | 233 ppi | -26.9% | 85.8 ppi less pixel density | 233 ppi vs 318.8 ppi |
| Screen Size | 4 " vs 5 " | 0.96 " smaller screen size | -19.3% | 4 " | -21.3% | 1.09 " smaller screen size | 4 " vs 5.1 " |
| Touch Screen | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 98.8% YES | ||||
| LCD Displays 3 Subpixels per Pixel | YES vs 58.7% YES | YES | YES vs 89.8% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Features
| Networks Connectivity | Samsung Galaxy Stellar vs average Samsung Networks connectivity features comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Samsung Galaxy Stellar | Difference in % | Difference in units | Samsung Galaxy Stellar vs average smartphone Networks connectivity features comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports Cellular Networks | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.9% YES | ||||
| GPS Navigation | YES vs 99.1% YES | YES | YES vs 98.7% YES | ||||
| Supports WiFi Connections | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.4% YES | ||||
| Bluetooth Version | 4 vs 4 | 0.01 newer Bluetooth version | 4 | 0.05 newer Bluetooth version | 4 vs 3.9 | ||
| Hotspot Wireless Sharing | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.9% YES | ||||
| 802.11n WiFi Connections | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.8% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Capacity
| Model Benchmarks | Samsung Galaxy Stellar vs average Samsung Benchmarks performance comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Samsung Galaxy Stellar | Difference in % | Difference in units | Samsung Galaxy Stellar vs average smartphone Benchmarks performance comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head SAR (US) Radio Frequency Absorption Rate | 0.64 W/kg vs 0.6 W/kg | 0.02 W/kg higher Head radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) | +3.9% | 0.64 W/kg | -21% | 0.17 W/kg lower Head radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) | 0.64 W/kg vs 0.8 W/kg |
| Body SAR (US) Radio Frequency Absorption Rate | 0.82 W/kg vs 1 W/kg | 0.16 W/kg lower Body radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) | -16.7% | 0.82 W/kg | -12.4% | 0.12 W/kg lower Body radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) | 0.82 W/kg vs 0.9 W/kg |
| Summary | |||||||
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.