Kyocera TorqueXT
Roll over image to zoom in
Best Kyocera TorqueXT Amazon.com Deals for Monday 27th of April 2026
Best Kyocera TorqueXT Ebay.com Deals for Monday 27th of April 2026
Kyocera TorqueXT E6710 Sprint Only 4GB Black New In Box...
$19.99
Replacement for TORQUEXT E6715 (for KYOCERA) and others...
$57.18
Design
| Cameras | Kyocera TorqueXT vs average Kyocera cameras details comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Kyocera TorqueXT | Difference in % | Difference in units | Kyocera TorqueXT vs average smartphone cameras details comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera Megapixels | 5 MP vs 6.4 MP | 1.44 MP less megapixels | -22.3% | 5 MP | -61.2% | 7.9 MP less megapixels in the main camera | 5 MP vs 12.9 MP |
| Front Camera | YES vs 90.9% YES | YES | YES vs 95.5% YES | ||||
| Flash / Flashlight | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 97.7% YES | ||||
| Built-in HDR Mode | YES vs 90% YES | YES | YES vs 88.3% YES | ||||
| Burst Mode (Serial Shot Mode) | YES vs 85.7% YES | YES | YES vs 52.2% YES | ||||
| Optical Zoom Range | 0 x | -100% | 0.08 x less optical zoom | 0 x vs 0.1 x | |||
| Flash Multi-LEDs | 1 vs 1 | 0 more flash LEDs | +0% | 1 | -22.3% | 0.29 less flash LEDs | 1 vs 1.3 |
| Front Camera Megapixels | 1.3 MP vs 2.3 MP | 0.96 MP less megapixels | -42.4% | 1.3 MP | -80.1% | 5.23 MP less megapixels in the front camera | 1.3 MP vs 6.5 MP |
| Main Camera Video Recording Resolution | 32400 fps vs 27120 fps | 5280 fps higher video recording resolution | +19.5% | 32400 fps | -12% | 4418.8 fps lower video recording resolution | 32400 fps vs 36818.8 fps |
| Panorama Creation from Multiple Photos | YES vs 92.9% YES | YES | YES vs 94.4% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Performance
| GPU Graphics Cards | Kyocera TorqueXT vs average Kyocera Graphics GPU options comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Kyocera TorqueXT | Difference in % | Difference in units | Kyocera TorqueXT vs average smartphone Graphics GPU options comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU Graphics Speed | 400 MHz vs 436.4 MHz | 36.36 MHz lower GPU Graphics speed | -8.3% | 400 MHz | -30.6% | 176.02 MHz lower GPU Graphics speed | 400 MHz vs 576 MHz |
| TFLOPS | 0.0288 TFLOPS vs 0 TFLOPS | 0.01 TFLOPS more floating-point performance | +30.1% | 0.0288 TFLOPS | -64.3% | 0.05 TFLOPS less floating-point performance | 0.0288 TFLOPS vs 0.1 TFLOPS |
| Pixels Rate per Second | 2.4 GPixel/s vs 1 GPixel/s | 1.4 GPixel/s higher pixel rate | +140% | 2.4 GPixel/s | -2.4% | 0.06 GPixel/s lower pixel rate | 2.4 GPixel/s vs 2.5 GPixel/s |
| Summary | |||||||
Features
| Software Versions, Standards, Formats | Kyocera TorqueXT vs average Kyocera Versions comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Kyocera TorqueXT | Difference in % | Difference in units | Kyocera TorqueXT vs average smartphone Versions comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenGL version | 3 vs 3.1 | 0.05 older OpenGL version | 3 | 0.05 older OpenGL version | 3 vs 3.1 | ||
| OpenVG version | 1.1 vs 2.7 | 1.58 older OpenVG version | 1.1 | 0.81 older OpenVG version | 1.1 vs 1.9 | ||
| OpenGL ES version | 2 vs 2.6 | 0.6 older OpenGL ES version | 2 | 0.9 older OpenGL ES version | 2 vs 2.9 | ||
| OpenGL ES 3.0 | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| EGL version | 1.4 vs 1.4 | 0 newer EGL version | 1.4 | 0 newer EGL version | 1.4 vs 1.4 | ||
| Summary | |||||||
Capacity
| Battery Capacity | Kyocera TorqueXT vs average Kyocera battery capacity comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Kyocera TorqueXT | Difference in % | Difference in units | Kyocera TorqueXT vs average smartphone battery capacity comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Power | 2500 mAh vs 2214.1 mAh | 285.88 mAh more battery power | +12.9% | 2500 mAh | +9.8% | 272.49 mAh less battery power | 2500 mAh vs 2772.5 mAh |
| Battery Level Indicator | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Rechargeable Battery | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Battery Life Hours | 18.5 h vs 15.6 h | 2.88 h more life hours | +18.5% | 18.5 h | -4% | 0.77 h less life hours | 18.5 h vs 19.3 h |
| Summary | |||||||
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.