Best Kazam Tornado 348 Amazon.com Deals for Monday 27th of April 2026
Best Kazam Tornado 348 Ebay.com Deals for Monday 27th of April 2026
Battery for KAZAM Thunder 348, Tornado 348...
$17.43
ANTISHOCK Screen protector for Kazam Tornado 348...
$5.99
Battery for KAZAM Thunder 348 Tornado 348 BL0001484 **2050mAh**...
$42.88
Accessories For Kazam Tornado 348: Sock Bag Case Sleeve Belt Clip Holster Arm......
$31.95
BNA-WB-L3367 Cell Phone Battery, Replacement for KAZAM BL0001484 Battery...
$21.95
PanzerGlass KAZAM Tornado 348 Standard Screen Protector...
$14.87
Design
| Display Options | Kazam Tornado 348 vs average Kazam display options comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Kazam Tornado 348 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Kazam Tornado 348 vs average smartphone display options comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 921600 px vs 1104548.6 px | 182948.57 px smaller resolution | -16.6% | 921600 px | -31% | 413146.99 px smaller resolution | 921600 px vs 1334747 px |
| Pixel Density | 306 ppi vs 292 ppi | 14 ppi higher pixel density | +4.8% | 306 ppi | -4% | 12.8 ppi lower pixel density | 306 ppi vs 318.8 ppi |
| Screen Size | 4.8 " vs 4.9 " | 0.13 " smaller screen size | -2.6% | 4.8 " | -5.6% | 0.29 " smaller | 4.8 " vs 5.1 " |
| Touch Screen | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 98.8% YES | ||||
| AMOLED Display | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 43.9% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Performance
| CPU Processor | Kazam Tornado 348 vs average Kazam CPU options comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Kazam Tornado 348 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Kazam Tornado 348 vs average smartphone CPU options comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Speed | 13.6 GHz vs 9.9 GHz | 3.66 GHz higher total CPU speed | +36.8% | 13.6 GHz | +57.4% | 4.96 GHz higher total CPU speed | 13.6 GHz vs 8.6 GHz |
| CPU Decode | 2 | -23.5% | 0.61 slower decode speed | 2 vs 2.6 | |||
| Dynamic Frequency Scaling | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| NEON Execution Bits | 64 vs 128 | 64 less NEON bits acceleration | -50% | 64 | -44.5% | 51.25 less NEON bits acceleration | 64 vs 115.2 |
| Supports NX Bits | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 98.7% YES | ||||
| Supports TrustZone | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| VFP Version | 4 vs 4 | 0 newer VFP version | 4 | 0.01 newer VFP version | 4 vs 4 | ||
| Number of CPU Threads | 8 | +41.7% | 2.36 more CPU threat(s) | 8 vs 5.6 | |||
| Supports OOE Out-of-Order Execution | YES | YES vs 40.8% YES | |||||
| Summary | |||||||
Features
| Networks Connectivity | Kazam Tornado 348 vs average Kazam Networks connectivity features comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Kazam Tornado 348 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Kazam Tornado 348 vs average smartphone Networks connectivity features comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports Cellular Networks | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.9% YES | ||||
| GPS Navigation | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 98.7% YES | ||||
| Supports WiFi Connections | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.4% YES | ||||
| Bluetooth Version | 4 vs 3.8 | 0.17 newer Bluetooth version | 4 | 0.05 newer Bluetooth version | 4 vs 3.9 | ||
| Hotspot Wireless Sharing | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.9% YES | ||||
| 802.11n WiFi Connections | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.8% YES | ||||
| Turn-by-Turn GPS Navigation | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.6% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Capacity
| Model Benchmarks | Kazam Tornado 348 vs average Kazam Benchmarks performance comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Kazam Tornado 348 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Kazam Tornado 348 vs average smartphone Benchmarks performance comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GeekBench Benchmark | 2379 | +57.2% | 865.76 higher score of GeekBench benchmark | 2379 vs 1513.2 | |||
| Head SAR (EU) Radio Frequency Absorption Rate | 0.25 W/kg | -63.6% | 0.44 W/kg lower Head radio frequency energy absorption rate (EU) | ||||
| Summary | |||||||







Reviews
There are no reviews yet.