Energizer Energy E500
Roll over image to zoom in
Best Energizer Energy E500 Amazon.com Deals for Saturday 25th of April 2026
Best Energizer Energy E500 Ebay.com Deals for Saturday 25th of April 2026
ANTISHOCK Screen protector for Energizer Energy E500...
$5.99
ANTISHOCK Screen protector for Energizer Energy E500S...
$5.99
ANTISHOCK Screen protector for Energizer Energy E500...
$9.39
USB Charging Data Cable Charger Cord for Energizer Energy Models...
$14.99
ANTISHOCK Screen protector for Energizer Energy E500S...
$9.39
Design
| Audio | Energizer Energy E500 vs average Energizer audio details comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Energizer Energy E500 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Energizer Energy E500 vs average smartphone audio details comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volume | 85.96302 cm³ vs 124.3 cm³ | 38.36 cm³ less volume | -30.9% | 85.96302 cm³ | -7.9% | 7.34 cm³ lower volume | 85.96302 cm³ vs 93.3 cm³ |
| Microphones Number | 1 vs 1.3 | 0.27 less microphone(s) | -21.4% | 1 | -37.5% | 0.6 less microphone(s) | 1 vs 1.6 |
| Built-in FM Radio | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 85.6% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Performance
| Storage Memory | Energizer Energy E500 vs average Energizer Storate memory options comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Energizer Energy E500 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Energizer Energy E500 vs average smartphone Storage memory options comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal Storage Memory | 8 GB vs 42.4 GB | 34.4 GB less internal storage memory | -81.1% | 8 GB | -79% | 30.17 GB less internal storage memory | 8 GB vs 38.2 GB |
| Maximum External Storage Memory | 32 GB vs 86.4 GB | 54.4 GB less maximum external storage memory | -63% | 32 GB | -85.3% | 184.97 GB less maximum external storage memory | 32 GB vs 217 GB |
| Summary | |||||||
Features
| OS & Software Features | Energizer Energy E500 vs average Energizer OS & Software features comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Energizer Energy E500 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Energizer Energy E500 vs average smartphone OS & Software features comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allows to Install APPs on the External Storage | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.9% YES | ||||
| Allows Widgets on the Home Screen | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Video Chat Function Available | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Screenshot of the Phone's Screen | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Number of Supported Languages | 125 vs 119.3 | 5.67 more supported languages | +4.7% | 125 | +27.7% | 27.08 more supported languages | 125 vs 97.9 |
| Number of Supported Emojis | 1560 vs 1525.7 | 34.29 more supported emojis | +2.2% | 1560 | +1.5% | 23.38 more supported emojis | 1560 vs 1536.6 |
| Supports Multi-User Login | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Child Lock - Children Protection | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Customizable Notifications | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.7% YES | ||||
| Free to Use & Open Source | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Java Support | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Supports OTA Over-the-Air Updates | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| OTA Over-the-Air Synchronization | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Capacity
| Model Benchmarks | Energizer Energy E500 vs average Energizer Benchmarks performance comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Energizer Energy E500 | Difference in % | Difference in units | Energizer Energy E500 vs average smartphone Benchmarks performance comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head SAR (EU) Radio Frequency Absorption Rate | 0.092 W/kg | -86.6% | 0.59 W/kg lower Head radio frequency energy absorption rate (EU) | ||||
| Body SAR (US) Radio Frequency Absorption Rate | 0.704 W/kg vs 1.3 W/kg | 0.64 W/kg lower Body radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) | -47.8% | 0.704 W/kg | -24.8% | 0.23 W/kg lower Body radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) | 0.704 W/kg vs 0.9 W/kg |
| Summary | |||||||
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.