Vivo Y27L
Roll over image to zoom in
Best Vivo Y27L Amazon.com Deals for Sunday 26th of April 2026
Fcs Glossy Finish Premium Transparent Silicon Back Case for Vivo Y27L...
$5.99
Case for Vivo Y27l Case Cover DK-LH...
$20.00
Case for Vivo Y27l Case Cover DK-LH...
$20.00
Landscape Protective Leather Hip Holster 331 Plus VG Headphones for Vivo Y27L Smartphone...
Case for Vivo Y27l Cover Flip PU Leather + Silicone case Fixed HS...
$20.00
Case for Vivo Y27l Case Cover DK-SN...
$20.00
Case for Vivo Y27l Case Cover DK-SJ...
$20.00
Case for Vivo Y27l Case Cover DK-SN...
$20.00
EUTOPING Touch Screen Panel digitizer Replacement for VIVO Y27 Y27L Y627 Y927...
EUTOPING Touch Screen Panel digitizer Replacement for VIVO Y27 Y27L Y627 Y927...
Best Vivo Y27L Ebay.com Deals for Sunday 26th of April 2026
ANTISHOCK Screen protector for Vivo Y27L...
$5.99
100% New High Quality Li-ion Battery For Vivo Y27 Y27L BK-B-76 2260mAh Internal...
$18.99
ANTISHOCK Screen protector for Vivo Y27L...
$9.39
For Vivo V3 Max V7 Plus V5 X7 X9 X21 X23 3D Mustache Back Hard Phone Case Cover...
$6.96
For Vivo V7 V3 Max V5 X7 X9 X21 X23 3D Lion Finger Holder Back Hard Phone Cover...
$6.93
Case For Vivo V7 Plus V5 V3 Max X7 X9 X21 X23 3D Retro Owl Back Hard Phone Cover...
$6.95
Case For Vivo V7 V3 Max V5 X7 X9 X20 X21 X23 3D Lips Eye Back Hard Phone Cover...
$6.98
Design
| Audio | Vivo Y27L vs average Vivo audio details comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Vivo Y27L | Difference in % | Difference in units | Vivo Y27L vs average smartphone audio details comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volume | 64.3 cm³ vs 88.8 cm³ | 24.46 cm³ less volume | -27.6% | 64.3 cm³ | -31.1% | 29 cm³ lower volume | 64.3 cm³ vs 93.3 cm³ |
| Microphones Number | 1 vs 1.8 | 0.81 less microphone(s) | -44.6% | 1 | -37.5% | 0.6 less microphone(s) | 1 vs 1.6 |
| 3.5 mm Audio Jack Socket | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 96.1% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Performance
| Storage Memory | Vivo Y27L vs average Vivo Storate memory options comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Vivo Y27L | Difference in % | Difference in units | Vivo Y27L vs average smartphone Storage memory options comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal Storage Memory | 16 GB vs 68 GB | 51.95 GB less internal storage memory | -76.5% | 16 GB | -58.1% | 22.17 GB less internal storage memory | 16 GB vs 38.2 GB |
| Maximum External Storage Memory | 128 GB vs 221.5 GB | 93.46 GB less maximum external storage memory | -42.2% | 128 GB | -41% | 88.97 GB less maximum external storage memory | 128 GB vs 217 GB |
| Summary | |||||||
Features
| Software Versions, Standards, Formats | Vivo Y27L vs average Vivo Versions comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Vivo Y27L | Difference in % | Difference in units | Vivo Y27L vs average smartphone Versions comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DirectX Version | 9.3 vs 10.9 | 1.61 older DirectX version | 9.3 | 1.24 older DirectX version | 9.3 vs 10.5 | ||
| OpenGL version | 3 vs 3 | 0.04 older OpenGL version | 3 | 0.05 older OpenGL version | 3 vs 3.1 | ||
| OpenVG version | 3 vs 1.7 | 1.27 newer OpenVG version | 3 | 1.09 newer OpenVG version | 3 vs 1.9 | ||
| OpenGL ES version | 3 vs 3 | 0.03 older OpenGL ES version | 3 | 0.1 newer OpenGL ES version | 3 vs 2.9 | ||
| OpenCL version | 1.1 vs 1.4 | 0.31 older OpenCL version | 1.1 | 0.17 older OpenCL version | 1.1 vs 1.3 | ||
| OpenGL ES 3.0 | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| EGL version | 1.4 vs 1.4 | 0 newer EGL version | 1.4 | 0 newer EGL version | 1.4 vs 1.4 | ||
| Summary | |||||||
Capacity
| Model Benchmarks | Vivo Y27L vs average Vivo Benchmarks performance comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Vivo Y27L | Difference in % | Difference in units | Vivo Y27L vs average smartphone Benchmarks performance comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head SAR (US) Radio Frequency Absorption Rate | 0.39 W/kg vs 0.9 W/kg | 0.52 W/kg lower Head radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) | -57% | 0.39 W/kg | -51.8% | 0.42 W/kg lower Head radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) | 0.39 W/kg vs 0.8 W/kg |
| Body SAR (US) Radio Frequency Absorption Rate | 0.58 W/kg vs 0.7 W/kg | 0.13 W/kg lower Body radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) | -18.1% | 0.58 W/kg | -38% | 0.36 W/kg lower Body radio frequency energy absorption rate (US) | 0.58 W/kg vs 0.9 W/kg |
| Summary | |||||||
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.