Best Xolo 8X-1000i Amazon.com Deals for Friday 2nd of January 2026

Turbo Quick Wall and Car Charger Kit for Xolo 8X-1000i with MicroUSB & USB Type-C Cables! (33Watts)...
$38.99

Professional 16GB MicroSDHC Certified for Xolo 8X-1000i by MIXZA is Pro-Speed, Heat & Cold Resistant, and Built for Life...
$15.99

SanDisk Ultra 512GB Verified for Xolo 8X-1000i by SanFlash (100MB/s A1 U1 MicroSDXC Works with SanDisk)...
$159.99

Professional Kingston 64GB Xolo 8X-1000i MicroSDXC Card with custom formatting and Standard SD Adapter! (Class 10, UHS-I...
$39.99

Adaptive Fast 15W Kit for Xolo 8X-1000i with Quick Charge Wall+Car+MicroUSB Cable gives 2x faster charging! (Black)...
$19.99

Adaptive Fast 15W Kit for Xolo 8X-1000i with Quick Charge Wall+Car+MicroUSB Cable gives 2x faster charging! (White)...
$19.99

Bright LED Wall & Car Kit for Xolo 8X-1000i with 6ft Micro-USB Cable and Touch Activated LED Light!...
$24.99

Adaptive QC 2.0 Wall Kit for Xolo 8X-1000i with cable! True Digital Adaptive Fast Charging uses dual voltage for up to 5...
$15.99

Tek Styz PRO Stylus for Xolo 8X-1000i High Accuracy Sensitive in Compact Form for Touch Screens [3 Pack-RED]...
$12.99

OEM Professional Kit for Xolo 8X-1000i 21W Fast 3A Wall Charger with 6ft/1.8M MicroUSB Cable...
$20.99
Best Xolo 8X-1000i Ebay.com Deals for Friday 2nd of January 2026
Design
| Display Options | Xolo 8X-1000i vs average Xolo display options comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Xolo 8X-1000i | Difference in % | Difference in units | Xolo 8X-1000i vs average smartphone display options comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 921600 px vs 1014208 px | 92608 px smaller resolution | -9.1% | 921600 px | -31% | 413146.99 px smaller resolution | 921600 px vs 1334747 px |
| Pixel Density | 294 ppi vs 304.3 ppi | 10.27 ppi lower pixel density | -3.4% | 294 ppi | -7.8% | 24.8 ppi lower pixel density | 294 ppi vs 318.8 ppi |
| Screen Size | 5 " vs 4.9 " | 0.06 " larger | +1.2% | 5 " | -1.7% | 0.09 " smaller screen size | 5 " vs 5.1 " |
| Touch Screen | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 98.8% YES | ||||
| IPS Screen | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 89.7% YES | ||||
| LCD Displays 3 Subpixels per Pixel | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 89.8% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Performance
| CPU Processor | Xolo 8X-1000i vs average Xolo CPU options comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Xolo 8X-1000i | Difference in % | Difference in units | Xolo 8X-1000i vs average smartphone CPU options comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU Speed | 11.2 GHz vs 6.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz higher total CPU speed | +75% | 11.2 GHz | +29.7% | 2.56 GHz higher total CPU speed | 11.2 GHz vs 8.6 GHz |
| CPU Decode | 2 vs 2.1 | 0.13 lower decode speed | -5.9% | 2 | -23.5% | 0.61 lower decode speed | 2 vs 2.6 |
| Dynamic Frequency Scaling | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| NEON Execution Bits | 64 vs 87.3 | 23.27 less NEON bits acceleration | -26.7% | 64 | -44.5% | 51.25 less NEON bits acceleration | 64 vs 115.2 |
| Supports NX Bits | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 98.7% YES | ||||
| Supports TrustZone | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| VFP Version | 4 vs 4 | 0 newer VFP version | 4 | 0.01 newer VFP version | 4 vs 4 | ||
| Number of CPU Threads | 8 vs 4.8 | 3.2 more CPU threat(s) | +66.7% | 8 | +41.7% | 2.36 more CPU threat(s) | 8 vs 5.6 |
| L2 Cache | 8.1 MB vs 1.8 MB | 6.3 MB more L2 cache | +350% | 8.1 MB | +555.7% | 6.86 MB more L2 cache | 8.1 MB vs 1.2 MB |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB vs 118.9 KB | 137.14 KB more L1 cache | +115.4% | 256 KB | +191.5% | 168.18 KB more L1 cache | 256 KB vs 87.8 KB |
| L2 Core | 1 MB/core vs 0.4 MB/core | 0.56 MB/core more L2 core | +127.8% | 1 MB/core | +160.7% | 0.62 MB/core more L2_core | 1 MB/core vs 0.4 MB/core |
| Supports OOE Out-of-Order Execution | YES vs 70% YES | YES | YES vs 40.8% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Features
| Internet & Smart Features | Xolo 8X-1000i vs average Xolo Internet & Smart features comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Xolo 8X-1000i | Difference in % | Difference in units | Xolo 8X-1000i vs average smartphone Internet & Smart features comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Download Speed | 21 MBits/s vs 78.2 MBits/s | 57.22 MBits/s slower Download speed | -73.2% | 21 MBits/s | -90.8% | 207.35 MBits/s slower Download speed | 21 MBits/s vs 228.3 MBits/s |
| Upload Speed | 5.76 MBits/s vs 25.8 MBits/s | 20.05 MBits/s slower Upload speed | -77.7% | 5.76 MBits/s | -89.4% | 48.69 MBits/s slower Upload speed | 5.76 MBits/s vs 54.5 MBits/s |
| Search Browser | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Free Navigation | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Browser Supports Word Wrap Function | YES vs 93.3% YES | YES | YES vs 97.9% YES | ||||
| Browser Supports Copy & Paste Functions | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Browser Supports Bookmarks Sync Across Devices | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.7% YES | ||||
| APP Sharing Capabilities | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Current Position of a Smartphone Location Tracking | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Supports Voice Commands | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 99.2% YES | ||||
| Offline Voice Commands Recognition | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Summary | |||||||
Capacity
| Battery Capacity | Xolo 8X-1000i vs average Xolo battery capacity comparison | Difference in units | Difference in % | Xolo 8X-1000i | Difference in % | Difference in units | Xolo 8X-1000i vs average smartphone battery capacity comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Power | 2000 mAh vs 2386.7 mAh | 386.67 mAh less battery power | -16.2% | 2000 mAh | -27.9% | 772.49 mAh less battery power | 2000 mAh vs 2772.5 mAh |
| Battery Level Indicator | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Rechargeable Battery | YES vs 100% YES | YES | YES vs 100% YES | ||||
| Battery Life Hours | 7.6 h vs 13.3 h | 5.74 h less life hours | -43% | 7.6 h | -60.6% | 11.67 h less life hours | 7.6 h vs 19.3 h |
| Summary | |||||||






Reviews
There are no reviews yet.